Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bde.35.1.3

Revision of the neotropical Schoenobryum Dozy & Molk.

Carlos Álvarez, Yelitza León Vargas

Abstract


The genus Schoenobryum Dozy & Molk., fifteen species in the world, fourteen of these are present in the Neotropics. The genus has not been taxonomically reviewed for this region until now. Therefore, we performed a morphological study with a phenetic perspective assessing the state of a set of characters in representative specimens from several important herbarium collections. We built a basic data matrix which was run using two computerized statistical packages. In this statistical exploration, we used principal component, cluster, and similarity analysis, whose results were later corroborated by checking each character and a thru a biogeographical analysis. Additionally, a peristome anatomical study was made to describe its anatomy. A taxonomic treatment is presented that involves a new circumscription of the genus with only the species S. julaceum Dozy & Molk. for the Neotropics, whose synonyms are: S. coffeae (C. Müll.) Manuel, S. gardneri (Mitt.) Manuel, S. paraguensis (Besch.) Manuel, S. rubricaule (Mitt.) Manuel, S. julaceum var. costaricensis (Ren. et Card.) Manuel.


Keywords


Character, species, herbarium, morphology, similarity.

Full Text:

PDF/A (693.81 KB)

References


Akiyama H. 2012. Morphology and Anatomy of the Peristome in Dozya japonica (Musci) and Reconsideration of its Affinity to the Leucodontaceae The Bryologist, 90: 409-416.

Álvarez, C. 2009. Utilidad del Programa AUTOCAD como Herramienta en el Dibujo Botánico. Universidad de Los Andes, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Ambientales. Pittieria 33: 89-97. Mérida, Venezuela.

Churchill, S. et al. 2000. A Checklist of the Mosses of the Tropical Andean Countries. Monografías del Real Jardín Botánico. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Madrid. Ruizia, Tom. 17, 209p.

Churchill, S. Y Linares, L. 1995. Prodromus Bryologiae Novo-Granatensis. Introducción a la Flora de Musgos de Colombia. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales – Museo de Historia Natural. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad nacional de Colombia. Bogotá. Tomo I. 453p.

Crosby, M. Et Al. 1992. Index of Mosses, 1963-1989. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. Vol 42. 646p.

D’ambrogio, A. 1986. Manual de Técnicas en Histología Vegetal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 83p.

Gradstein, S. Et Al. 2001. Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. The New York Botanical Garden Press. 577p.

Hammer, Ø. Et Al. 2001. PAST. En línea, 05 de agosto de 2010. http://folk.uio. no/ohammer/past/

La Farge-England, C. 1996. Growth Form, Branching Pattern, and Perichaetial Position in Mosses: Cladocarpy and Pleurocarpy Redefined. Cryptogamic Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9. The Bryologist 99(2), pp. 170-186. Canada.

Manuel, M. 1977. Short Articles. Studies in Cryphaeaceae IV. New Combination in Schoenobryum. American Bryological and Lichenological Society. 80(3): 522- 524.

Manuel, M. 1982. A brief review of the systematic of the Leucodontaceae and the Cryphaeaceae. Bryophyte Taxonomy. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 71: 281-289.

Mccune, B. & Grace, J.B. (with Urban, D.L.) 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Mjm Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, US.

O´Shea B. 2003. Tropical Bryology 24: 147-159, 2003. A revision of Schoenobryum (Cryphaeaceae, Bryopsida) in Africa. Tropical Bryology: 24: 147- 159

Roth, I. 1964. Microtécnica Vegetal. Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ciencias. Escuela de Biología. Caracas. 89p.

Wijk, R. v. d., W. D. Margadant & P. A. Florschütz. 1959. Index Muscorum. 1 (A--C). Regnum Veg. 17. xxviii + 548 p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2381-9677 (print); ISSN 2381-9685 (online)

Published by Magnolia Press, Auckland, New Zealand