Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.8.1.1

Further proposals about higher zoological nomenclature, and a lesson of humility: the solution to a recent controversy about the authorship and date of the nomen Amphibia had already been published one century ago

Alain Dubois

Abstract


The absence in the Code of Rules for the nomenclature of zoological taxa above the rank superfamily is an impediment to universal and unambiguous communication about the higher taxonomy of animals. Pending the possible fixing of the Code in this respect, it appears justified to develop a set of simple ‘guidelines’ which could be adopted consensually by the taxonomists who wish so. They could include: (1) the convention that the ‘same name’ given to different higher taxa results in the existence (and therefore availability) of different homonymous nomina, having different authors and dates; (2) the convention that a nomen of higher taxon first introduced clearly as a scientific, not vernacular, name but in a non-Latin form, and that was latinised subsequently in the literature, should be credited to the author of the original work; (3) the need to ‘protect’ the best known and most often used higher zoological nomina (sozonyms and sozodiaphonyms), with the dominant meanings and spellings that they have had for decades or centuries in the biological literature, irrespective of being or not the first ones to have been proposed for the taxa at stake or among homonyms; (4) the implementation of the Principles of Homonymy and of Priority among all the other nomina of higher taxa. These proposals are illustrated by examples in amphibian higher nomenclature, concerning the well-known nomina Amphibia and Batrachia, which have been the matter of recent controversies. An unexpected finding is reported here: that a similar debate on this same question developed in the years 1889–1910, mostly in the journal Science, and was closed by a clear and simple solution, which has fallen into complete oblivion since then. This suggests that our databases are incomplete and that we should be more humble in our debates than we often are, as we are still missing important pieces of information on the past literature.


Keywords


higher nomenclature, Rules, sozonymy, homonymy, priority, non-Latin scientific names, well-known names, ancient literature, journal Science, controversies, databases.

Full Text:

PDF/A (180 KB)

References


Anonymous (1896) Editor’s table. The American Naturalist, 30: 1027. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/276516>

Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edition. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix +1–306.

Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2003) Declaration 44. Amendment of Article 74.7.3. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 60 (4): 263.

Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa, 3450: 1–7.

Alonso-Zarazaga, M. A. (2005) Nomenclature of higher taxa: a new approach. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 62: 189–199.

Batsch, A. J. G. C. (1788) Versuch einer Anleitung, zur Kennniss und Geschichte der Thiere und Mineralien. Erster Theil. Jena (Akademischen Buchhandlung): i–viii + 1–528, pl. 1–5.

Baur, G. (1897) Amphibia or Batrachia. Science, (n.s.), 6: 170–174.

Blackburn, D. C. & Wake, D. B. (2011) Class Amphibia Gray, 1825. In: Z.-Q. Zhang (Ed.), Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness, Zootaxa, 3148: 39–55.

Boero, F. (2010) The study of species in the era of biodiversity: a tale of stupidity. Diversity, 2: 115–126. <http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d2010115>

Brands, S. J. (Ed.) (2014) Systema Naturae 2000. Universal Taxonomic Services, Zwaag, Amsterdam. <http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl>. [Last accessed on 31 January 2014].

Brongniart, A. (1800a) Essai d’une classification naturelle des reptiles. Iere partie. Etablissement des ordres. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société philomatique, 2 (35): 81–82.

Brongniart, A. (1800b) Essai d’une classification naturelle des reptiles. IIe partie. Formation et disposition des genres. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société philomathique de Paris, 2 (36): 89–91, pl. 6.

Brown, L. E., Dubois, A. & Shepard, D. B. (2008) Inefficiency and bias of search engines in retrieving references containing scientific names of fossil amphibians. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28 (4): 279–288. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467608320197>

Cantino, P.D., de Queiroz, K. (2010) International code of phylogenetic nomenclature. Version 4c. 1–102. <http://www.ohio.edu/PhyloCode4c>. [Last accessed on 9 April 2015].

Cope, E.D. (1868) Synopsis of the extinct Batrachia of North America. Proceedings of the Academy of natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1868: 208–221.

Cope, E.D. (1884) The Batrachia of the Permian period of North America. The American Naturalist, 18: 26–39, pl. 2–5. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/273563>

Cope, E. D. (1889a) The Batrachia of North America. Bulletin of the United States national Museum, 34: 1–525, pl. 1–86.

Cope, E. D. (1889b) Synopsis of the families of Vertebrata. The American Naturalist, 23: 849–877.

Crisci, J. V. (2006a) One-dimensional systematist: perils in a time of steady progress. Systematic Botany, 31 (1): 217–221.

Crisci, J. V. (2006b) Making taxonomy visible. Systematic Botany, 31 (2): 439–440.

Cuvier, G. (1802) Lectures on comparative anatomy. Translated from the French of G. Cuvier (…) by William Ross, under the inspection of James Macartney (…). Vol. 1. On the organs of motion. London (Longman & Rees): i–xl + 1–542, tab. 1–9.

De Blainville, H. (1816) Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Bulletin des Sciences de la Société philomatique de Paris, juillet 1816: ‘105–112’ [in fact 113–120] + 121–124.

De Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2008) Systematics must embrace comparative biology and evolution, not speed and automation. Evolutionary Biology, 35: 150–157. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11692-008-9018-7>

De Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S., Brandão, C. R. F., de Vivo, M., de Figueiredo, J. L., Britski, H. A., de Pinna, M. C. C., Menezes, N. A., Marques, F. P. L., Papavero, N., Cancello, E. M., Crisci, J. V., McEachran, J. D., Schelly, R. C., Lundberg, J. G., Gill, A. C., Britz, R., Wheeler, Q. D., Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R., Page, L. M., Wheeler, W. C., Faivovich, J., Vari, R. P., Grande, L., Humphries, C. J., DeSalle, R., Ebach, M. C. & Nelson, G. (2007) Taxonomic impediment or impediment to taxonomy? A commentary on systematics and the cybertaxonomic-automation paradigm. Evolutionary Biology, 34: 140–143. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9011-6>

De Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S., de Vivo, M., de Toledo-Piza, M., Menezes, N. A., de Figueiredo, J. L., Castro, R. M. C., Gill, A. C., McEachran, J. D., Compagno, L. J. V., Schelly, R. C., Britz, R., Lundberg, J. G., Vari, R. P. & Nelson, G. (2005) Revisiting the taxonomic impediment. Science, 307: 353. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.307.5708.353b>

De Carvalho, M. R., Ebach, M. C., Williams, D. M., Nihei, S. S., Rodrigues, M. T., Grant, T., Silveira, L. F., Zaher, H., Gill, A. C., Schelly, R. C., Sparks, J. S., Bockmann, F. A., Séret, B., Ho, H.-C., Grande, L., Rieppel, O., Dubois, A., Ohler, A., Faivovich, J., Assis, L. C. S., Wheeler, Q. D., Goldstein, P. Z., de Almeida, E. A. B., Valdecasas, A. G. & Nelson, G. (2014) Does counting species count as taxonomy? On misrepresenting systematics, yet again. Cladistics, 30 (3): 322–329. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cla.12045>

De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. (1992) Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 23: 449–480. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002313>

Dubois, A. (2000) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4 (2): 33–98.

Dubois, A. (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. Comptes rendus Biologies, 326 (suppl. 1): S9–S21. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1631-0691(03)00022-2>

Dubois, A. (2004) The higher nomenclature of recent amphibians. Alytes, 22: 1–14.

Dubois, A. (2005) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 27: 365–426.

Dubois, A. (2006a) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale. Zoosystema, 28 (1): 165–258.

Dubois, A. (2006b) Incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked taxa into the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: some basic questions. Zootaxa, 1337: 1–37.

Dubois, A. (2008) Identifying some major problems and their possible solutions. In: Future trends of taxonomy, EDIT Symposium, Carvoeiro (Portugal), 21–23 January 2008: 38–42.

Dubois, A. (2009) Incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked taxa into the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: the nomenclatural status of class-series zoological nomina published in a non-latinized form. Zootaxa, 2106: 1–12.

Dubois, A. (2010) Zoological nomenclature in the century of extinctions: priority vs. “usage”. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution, 10: 259–274. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-010-0021-3>

Dubois, A. (2011) The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be drastically improved before it is too late. Bionomina, 2: 1–104. <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.2.1.1>

Dubois, A. (2013) Zygoidy, a new nomenclatural concept. Bionomina, 6: 1–25. <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.6.1.1>

Dubois, A. (2015) Zoological nomina in the century of extinctions: new proposals. Bionomina, 8: 11–53. <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.8.1.2>

Dubois, A. & Bour, R. (2010a) The nomenclatural status of the nomina of amphibians and reptiles created by Garsault (1764), with a parsimonious solution to an old nomenclatural problem regarding the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura), comments on the taxonomy of this genus, and comments on some nomina created by Laurenti (1768). Zootaxa, 2447: 1–52.

Dubois, A. & Bour, R. (2010b) The distinction between family-series and class-series nomina in zoological nomenclature, with emphasis on the nomina created by Batsch (1788, 1789) and on the higher nomenclature of turtles. Bonn zoological Bulletin, 57 (2): 149–171.

Dubois, A. & Raffaëlli, J. (2012) A new ergotaxonomy of the order Urodela Duméril, 1805 (Amphibia, Batrachia). Alytes, 28 (3–4): 77–161.

Duellman, W. E. & Trueb, L. (1985) Biology of amphibians. New York (McGraw-Hill), “1986”: i–xix + 1–670.

Fei, L., Hu, S., Ye. C. & Huang, Y. (2006) Fauna sinica: Amphibia. Vol. 1. General accounts of Amphibia. Gymnophiona and Urodela. Beijing (Science Press): [i–vii] + i–viii + 1–471, pl. 1–16.

Fouquette, M. J., Jr. & Dubois, A. (2014) A checklist of North American Amphibians and Reptiles. Volume 1. Amphibians. USA (XLibris): 1–613.

Frost, D. R. (1985) Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Lawrence, Kansas, USA (Allen Press, Inc. & The Association of Systematics Collections): i–v + 1–732.

Frost, D. (2014) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0. New York, American Museum of Natural History. <http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/> [Last accessed on 18 March 2015].

Frost D. R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bazin, R. H., Haas, A., Haddad, C. F. B., de Sá, R. O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S. C., Raxworthy, C. J., Campbell, J. A., Blotto, B. L., Moler, P., Drewes, R. C., Nussbaum, R. A., Lynch, J. D., Green, D. M., Wheeler, W. C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297: 1–370. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2>

García-París, M., Montori, A. & Herrero, P. (2004) Amphibia: Lissamphibia. Fauna Iberica, 24, Madrid (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas): 1–639.

Garsault, F. A. P. de (1764) Les figures des plantes et animaux d’usage en médecine, décrits dans la Matière Médicale de Mr. Geoffroy Médecin. Paris: [i–v] + 1–20, pl. 644–729.

Gill, T. (1896) Some questions of nomenclature. Science, (n.s.), 4: 581–601.

Gill, T. (1897) Amphibia or Batrachia. Science, (n.s.), 6: 446–447.

Gill, T. (1900) The earliest use of the names Sauria and Batrachia. Science, (n.s.), 12: 730.

Gill, T. (1910) First use of Amphibia in its modern sense. Science, (n.s.), 31: 958–959.

Gray, J. E. (1825) A synopsis of the genera of Reptiles and Amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy, (2), 10: 193–217.

Haeckel, E. (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Zweiter Band. Allgemeine Entwickelunggsgeschichte der Organismen. Berlin (Georg Kramer): i–clx + 1–462, pl. 1–8. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110848281>

Haeckel, E. (1889) Natürliche Schöpfungs-Geschichte. Achte umgearbeitete und vermehrte Auflage. Berlin (Reimer): i–xxxi + 1–832, 1 pl.

Hay, O. P. (1897) Amphibia vs. Batrachia. Science, (n.s.), 6: 773–774.

Huxley, T. H. (1871) A manual of the anatomy of vertebrated animals. London (J. & A. Churchill): i–vii + 1–510. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.99672>

Kirby, W. (1835) On the power, wisdom and goodness of God as manifested in the creation of animals and in their history, habits and instincts. Vol. 2. London (William Pickering): i–viii + 1–542, 20 pl.

Kluge, N. J. (1999) [A system of alternative nomenclatures of the supraspecific taxa.] Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 78 (1): 224–243 [In Russian]. English translation: A system of alternative nomenclatures of supra-species taxa. Linnaean and post-Linnaean principles of systematics. Entomological Review, 79 (2): 133–147.

Kluge, N. J. (2000) Sovremennaya sistematika nasekomyh (...). [Modern systematics of insects. Part 1. Principles of systematics of living organisms and general system of insects with classification of primary wingless andpaleopterous insects]. Saint-Petersburg (Lan’): 1–336. [In Russian].

Kluge, N. J. (2010) Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda. Bionomina, 1: 15–55. <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.1.1.3>

Kuhn, O. (1965) Die Amphibien. Krailling bei München (Oeben): 1–102.

Lanza, B., Nistri, A. & Vani, S. (2009) Anfibi d’Italia. Italy (Grandi e Grandi Editore): 1–450.

Latreille P. A. (1800) Histoire naturelle des salamandres de France, précédée d’un tableau méthodique des autres reptiles. Paris (Villier): i–xlvii + 1–63, pl. 1–6.

Latreille, P. A. (1806) Genera crustaceorum et insectorum secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurimis explicata. Tomus primus. Parisiis & Argentorati (Amand Koenig): [i–v] + i–xviii + 1–303, pl. 1–16.

Latreille, [P. A.] (1824) Esquisse d’une distribution générale du règne animal. Paris (Agasse): 1–22.

Latreille, [P. A.] (1825) Familles naturelles du règne animal. Paris (Baillière): [i–v] + 1–570.

Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus I. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii): [i–iv] + 1–824.

Linnaeus, C. (1766) Systema Naturae. Editio duodecima, reformata. Tomus I, Pars I. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii): 1–532.

Macleay, W. S. (1821) Horae entomologicae: or Essays on the annulose animals. Volume 1. Part 2. London (Bagster): [i] + 161–524.

Merrem, B. (1820) Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien. Tentamen systematis Amphibiorum. Marburg (Iohann Christian Krieger): [i–xv + 1–191] ´ 2, 1 pl.

Mounce, R. (2015) Dark research: information content in many modern research papers is not easily discoverable online. PeerJ PrePrints, 5 January 2015: 1–9. <http://dx.doi.org:10.7287/peerj.preprints.773v1>

Müller, J. (1831) Kiemenlöcher an einer jungen Coecilia hypocyanea, im Museum der Naturgeschichte zu Leyden beobachtet vom Prof. Joh Müller. Isis von Oken, 24: 709–711.

Oppel, M. (1811a) Ordre II. Reptiles à écailles. Section 2. Ophidiens. Annales du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, “1810”, 16: 254–295 + 376–393.

Oppel, M. (1811b) Second mémoire sur la classification des Reptiles. Annales du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, 16: 394–418.

Owen, O. (1841) Odontography; or, a treatise on the comparative anatomy of the teth; their physiological relations, mode of development, and microscopic structure, in the vertebrate animals. Volume 1. Text. London (Hippolyte Baillière): i–xxi + i–lxxiv + 1–655.

Padial, J. M. & de la Riva, I. (2007) Taxonomy, the Cinderella of science, hidden by its evolutionary stepsister. Zootaxa, 1577: 1–2.

Pearsall, J. (Ed.) (2001) The new Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford (Oxford University Press): i–xxi + 1–2152.

Ritgen, F. A. (1828) Versuch einer natürlichen Eintheilung der Vögel. Nova Acta physico-medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, 14: 245–284.

Sanchíz, B. (1998) Salientia. In: P. Wellnhofer (Ed.), Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie, Teil 4, München (Friedrich Pfeil): i–xii + 1–275.

Stejneger, L. (1904) Amphibia versus Batrachia. Science, (n.s.), 20: 924–925.

Stejneger, L. (1907) Herpetology of Japan and adjacent territory. Bulletin of the United States national Museum, 58: i–xx + 1–577, pl. 1–35. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.58.i>

Tancoigne, E. & Dubois, A. (2013) Taxonomy: no decline, but inertia. Cladistics, 29 (5): 567‑570. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cla.12019>

Trueb, L. & Cloutier, R. (1991). A phylogenetic investigation of the inter- and intrarelationships of the Lissamphibia (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). In: H.-P. Schultze & L. Trueb (Ed.), Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods: controversy and consensus, Ithaca & New York (Cornell University Press): 223–313.

Valdecasas, A. G., Williams, D. & Wheeler, Q. D. (2008) “Integrative taxonomy” then and now: a response to Dayrat (2005). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93: 211–216.

Von Meyer, H. (1832) Palaeologica zur Geschichte der Erde und ihrer Geschöpfe. Frankfurt am Main (Siegmund Schmerber): 1–560.

Wheeler, Q. D. (2004) Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society, (B), 359: 571–583. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1452>

Wilder, B. G. (1897) Amphibia or Batrachia. Science, (n.s.), 6: 295–296.

Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) (2011) Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa, 3148: 1–237.

Zittel, K. A. (1888) Handbuch der Palaeontologie. I Abtheilung. Palaeozoologie. III Band. Vertebrata (Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves). Second instalment. München & Leipzig (R. Oldenbourg): 257–436.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

ISSN 1179-7649 (print);   ISSN 1179-7657 (online)

Published by Magnolia Press, Auckland, New Zealand